b_edited.png)
L. Poenaru
The barrage of stimuli in cybercapitalism—characterized by constant exposure to digital content, rapid information cycles, and the omnipresence of social media—can be intricately understood through the lens of opponent process theory. This theory, originally proposed by Solomon and Corbit in 1974, posits that emotional responses to stimuli are often followed by an opposing process that counteracts the initial emotional reaction. Over time, this counteracting process can become stronger, leading to habituation and a shifting emotional landscape.
The theory of opponent process suggests that emotional responses are not isolated or static but are dynamically regulated through opposing processes that work to maintain emotional equilibrium. This theory posits that emotional experiences are the result of two opposing processes:
The primary process (A-process): This is the initial emotional response to a stimulus. It is usually strong and direct, elicited immediately after the stimulus is encountered. For example, when you drink coffee, you may initially feel a strong sense of alertness and energy. This is the A-process, which is positive in this case.
The opponent process (B-process): The B-process is a secondary emotional response that counteracts the A-process. It typically begins shortly after the A-process starts and works to balance or reduce the intensity of the initial emotion. The B-process is usually opposite in nature to the A-process. For instance, after the initial alertness from coffee, you might experience a "crash" or a feeling of fatigue as the B-process kicks in to counteract the heightened arousal.
These processes work in tandem to keep a physiological variable (like body temperature, blood pressure, or emotional state) within a narrow, optimal range. When one process pushes a variable away from its set point, the opposing process acts to bring it back.
Homeostasis begins with the detection of a change in the internal environment. For example, if your body temperature rises above the normal range, sensors in your body detect this deviation. Once the change is detected, an opponent process is activated to counteract it. In the case of a rise in body temperature, the body initiates cooling mechanisms, such as sweating and vasodilation (widening of blood vessels), to dissipate heat and lower the temperature. The opponent process continues until the variable (in this case, body temperature) returns to its set point. Once the temperature is back within the normal range, the cooling mechanisms are dialed down or stopped, preventing the body from cooling too much. This system operates continuously, with the opposing processes constantly adjusting to small deviations from the set point. For example, if the body starts to cool too much, the opposing process of heat production (e.g., shivering, vasoconstriction) will kick in to warm the body back up.
In the context of cybercapitalism, the continuous onslaught of stimuli, ranging from advertisements, notifications, and sensational news to the instant gratification offered by social media, creates a complex emotional environment for individuals. These stimuli often elicit strong emotional reactions—whether it's excitement, outrage, or pleasure—which are then followed by an opponent process, a contrasting emotional state that seeks to restore equilibrium. For example, the initial excitement from receiving social media notifications can be followed by a sense of emptiness or dissatisfaction, as the opposing process dampens the initial positive response.
Over time, the constant exposure to such stimuli can lead to a kind of emotional numbing or desensitization, where the opponent processes become more pronounced. The initial highs become less satisfying, and individuals may find themselves in a state of chronic dissatisfaction or anxiety, driven by the need to continuously seek new stimuli to achieve the same emotional highs. This is particularly evident in how social media platforms and digital marketing are designed to exploit these emotional cycles, keeping users engaged through an endless loop of anticipation, gratification, and subsequent emotional downturn.
This dynamic can be seen as part of a broader process of emotional regulation under cybercapitalism, where the market's need to keep individuals engaged leads to the commodification of attention and emotions. The constant pursuit of novelty and stimulation can be understood as a manifestation of the capitalist drive to maximize engagement and profit, often at the cost of psychological well-being.
In a deeper psychological and philosophical sense, this cycle of stimuli and opponent processes under cybercapitalism reflects a kind of existential restlessness.
The transient satisfaction provided by digital consumption highlights the broader alienation individuals may experience in a capitalist system where even emotions and experiences are commodified. This could lead to a state of perpetual dissatisfaction, where the pursuit of fulfillment is constantly thwarted by the very mechanisms designed to provide it.
Therefore, the barrage of stimuli in cybercapitalism is not merely an incidental byproduct of technological advancement but is deeply intertwined with the psychological mechanisms of opponent processes. It reflects a systemic exploitation of emotional responses, perpetuating a cycle that reinforces the economic imperatives of cybercapitalism while simultaneously contributing to the emotional and psychological challenges faced by individuals in the digital age.
References
Solomon, R. L., & Corbit, J. D. (1974). An opponent-process theory of motivation: I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychological Review, 81(2), 119-145.
Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2009). The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 180-191.
Rosen, L. D. (2008). Me, MySpace, and I: Parenting the Net Generation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Elhai, J. D., Levine, J. C., Dvorak, R. D., & Hall, B. J. (2017). Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 509-516.
Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583-15587.
Alter, A. (2017). Irresistible: The Rise of Addictive Technology and the Business of Keeping Us Hooked. Penguin Press.
Carr, N. (2010). The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. W.W. Norton & Company.
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1944). Dialectic of Enlightenment. (J. Cumming, Trans.). New York: Herder and Herder.
Moulier-Boutang, Y. (2012). Cognitive Capitalism. Polity Press.
Comments